Why aren't you seeing the same thing I see? IT'S THE SAME DAMN DATA! I'm just not trying to sell you vaccines

Here on this blog I have on several occasions discussed how science, other than pure mathematics, is all about interpretation of data. That's just the way it works when you are trying to show how specific factors, such as including a specific chemical in a diet, affect a population. We all know that chemicals, toxins, poisons, all affect INDIVIDUALS differently. Using statistical analysis researchers then extrapolate what they THINK happens to populations based on the data garnered from experimenting on individuals. That's where things get tricky, it's that old statistical analysis. I took three semesters of statistics in college, (it was required for my degree) and I have to admit that for the most part, that whole branch of science makes very little sense. It's all about INTERPRETING data to reach conclusions. My son works for an organization (he doesn't want me to state which agency) and he will tell you that there are in fact 23 different ways in which you can arrive at an average for a specific environmental gradient and the method you use to get there depends on what you need. If it's to avoid federal fines, you use a different method than the method you use to issue fines to major businesses. It's all in HOW you interpret data. 

So, let's look at the science rag Journal of Toxicology in the October 2014 edition. (JT 10-2014) which as you will see if you go there is all about aluminum. Realistically aluminum (Al) has not been a part of human development. It just wasn't found as salts or compounds in nature. Then about 160 years ago humans began to mine Al and use it in industry. And of course, this has led to free Al being in our environments, in our food, and lately, in our vaccines. This study details pretty specifically how Al is a compound that acts on the Central Nervous System (CNS) in a number of deleterious ways and across multiple levels to induce biometric entropy, which is basically corruption of biological messages from genes, epigenetics, proteins, cells, tissues and organs. The article points out how CNS problems are correlated with diseases like Autism Spectral Disorder. Then it goes on to explain that using Al adjuvants in a vaccine is dangerous as the Al stays in the body and studies have shown that the adjuvants travel to the brain where they can be detected up to a year after injection. And here is a good place to note that aluminum has ABSOLUTELY no function in human anatomy and is considered a neurotoxin.

Am I reading that report right? Aluminum is BAD?

Okay, yeah, I did read that report correctly. So why do they use Al in vaccines anyway? Well, let's see. If we look at the 2011 issue of Current Medical Chemistry (CMC 2011) “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.”  and then down a bit is this  “The issue of vaccine safety thus becomes even more pertinent given that, to the best of our knowledge, no adequate clinical studies have been conducted to establish the safety of concomitant administration of two experimentally-established neurotoxins, aluminum and mercury, the latter in the form of ethyl mercury (thimerosal) in infants and children. Since these molecules negatively affect many of the same biochemical processes and enzymes implicated in the etiology of autism, the potential for a synergistic toxic action is plausible. Additionally, for the purpose of evaluating safety and efficacy, vaccine clinical trials often use an aluminium-containing placebo, either containing the same or greater amount of aluminum as the test vaccine. Without exception, these trials report a comparable rate of adverse reactions between the placebo and the vaccine group (for example, 63.7% vs 65.3% of systemic events and 1.7% vs 1.8% of serious adverse events respectively.” and further down on page 3 is this bit "..infants and children in the U.S. receive up to 49 times the FDA safety limit for Aluminum during each vaccine session"

Am I reading that report right? On test groups they inject kids and get nearly the same rate of adverse reactions along with SERIOUS reactions whether they are in the test group or the placebo group when the placebo has nothing but Al in it?

 Yeah, I read that right. But let's take a look at the science rag Entropy (Entropy Sept 2012) which is where I got this little bit of info, "We propose that children with the autism diagnosis are especially vulnerable to toxic metals such as aluminum and mercury due to insufficient serum sulfate and glutathione. A strong correlation between autism and the MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine is also observed"

Am I reading that report right? Yeah, I am.

 Okay, let's look at another rag, the very prestigious Journal of Toxicology in the June 2013 issue (JT 2013) And here we see another interesting conclusion by actual scientists. "Thimerosal clearly demonstrates that certain individuals with a mild mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to mitochondrial specific toxins like thimerosal. What does this mean? It means that people with a slight DNA difference are at risk for developing neurodegenerative diseases via vaccination." And to those that believe that Mercury is no longer present in vaccines need to ask your doctor to read the label before they inject that flu or pneumonia vaccine into yourself or your child. They did remove it from many vaccines, but it is still used extensively in many of the other vaccines like flu and pneumonia. And actually you can look up the ingredients of vaccines on the FDA website. 

So, am I reading that report right? Yeah, for some with a genetic predisposition, mercury in vaccines can lead to neurodegenerative disorders. Is there a way to test for that? No, you take your chances. It's a crap shoot as they say. One in six children today in America have diagnosable behavioral disorders. One in fifty have Autism. For every one thousand live births, eighteen die before the age of two.That infant mortality rate is higher than CUBA!!!!

Realistically there is no SPECIFIC scientific study that links childhood vaccinations to any problems. Who would pay for it, and what rag would print it? Advertising revenue pretty much governs what goes into magazines, the news, well, our world. It doesn't diminish reality though. There is a huge correlation between the causative effects of vaccination and increased autism as well as the very big one, increased infant mortality. Which is detailed quite extensively in this report (NCBI on SIDS)

 I'm not an idiot. I understand that vaccines save lives. The specific concept is sound, the execution of that concept has become corrupted within the pharmacology industry today. As long as there is no accountability to the pharmacology industry for their products, there will never be true safety. Shortcuts, falsified data, lies and the quest for billions of dollars in profits for the entire industry drive the NEED to vaccinate everyone. Last time I went to my doctor, he again told me to get the flu vaccine. This time, I asked him if he had read the information that came with it. He said no, he didn't need to. The vaccine would keep me from getting the flu. I then told him to read the warnings, that if I was already sick, which is why I was there, then the warning advised against vaccinating me. There are a whole host of things on that warning label, and he had never looked at it. I don't think he is the only doctor that does that. After all, over fifty of the seventy bucks charged to your insurance company goes right into his pocket.